Dylan Campbell

WHY SHOULD PROGRESS

Dylan Campbell

WHY SHOULD PROGRESS focus on the measurable? Nurburgring lap times dropping, 0-100km/h times getting insanely quick, power outputs getting so big theyíre hard to properly comprehend. And tyres? Wider and with ever more lateral grip, necessitating wilder and more ambitious speeds to get them unstuck. The preserve of racetracks, basically. Should you need to drive on a track to properly enjoy the magic of your new performance road car?

AN OBSESSION WITH GRIP IS COMING AT THE COST OF FUN. DO WE REALLY NEED TO KEEP GOING FASTER?

This month, I found myself wondering if MOTORís Tyre Test, which youíll read this issue, should be more subjective. As in, ditch the numbers completely. Relax - we had good reason for this. Not doing much for my own stress levels, we actually did our Tyre Test twice this month. The first one basically got rained out, and I was The Guy who had to shut it down as, with a key variable way out of our control - surface condition - we were all wasting our time. But it did cross my mind, fleetingly, that we save ourselves doing it all over again and just ask Warren Luff which tyre behaved nicest at its limit, and was even most fun to drive on. Feel, basically.

Some weeks earlier, I was thinking about how garbage the 175-section, 14-inch tyres are on my personal car, an AE86 Toyota Sprinter. Somewhere in the Victorian high country, my Hachi Rokuís front end was pushing, and its rear end yawing, at speeds that would be an amble for something like a new Renault Megane RS. But while I was going half the speed, I was easily having twice the fun. I know this is not a new thought, but thereís a reason it keeps coming up.

Having driven all the latest GT cars from Porsche (tough gig, I know), the first thing Iíd do if I bought one is wear out the standard Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 tyres and replace them with something looser, just to feel that amazing chassis move about at more realistic speeds. For track use, I might just go full slicks if I could afford it (and if I owned a 911 GT3, I could). Why bother with a tyre that has too much grip for the road and not enough for the track?

5. Alfa 4C vs IKEA. Come on, itís a seven seater in parts of South East Asia

The big tyre brands should consider developing products that promise to show off more of your performance carís chassis at less terrifying speeds. And Iím not talking Michelin Primacys on a Toyota 86 - these are not much chop to drive on, frankly, as they donít behave like a performance tyre at the ragged edge. Nope, I mean tyres that donít claw into the bitumen quite as tenaciously, but instead prioritise feel and friendly on-limit behaviour, those impossible things to quantify. And things that canít be said about the cheapest of tyres, which can be a bit dicey to drive fast on, or just donít work in the wet.

Weíre not about to introduce a subjective element to MOTORís Tyre Test as managing the numbers is already tricky enough. And not even the best road testers at MOTOR or anywhere have the bum-o-meters to properly compare things like tyre feel and behaviour. But the new performance tyre market is almost a microcosm for the new sports car market in general. Case in point again, the new Renault Megane RS would be undoubtedly seconds faster than its predecessor around the Nurburgring or any track, but half the reason itís fallen out of favour with many road testers is you just need to be going too fast to get it to do anything. In other words, it has too much grip. In so many areas of life, less can be more. And perhaps itís time a bit of that applied to if not new performance cars, then the new performance tyres they wear.

05 OUT-TAKES THIS MONTH AT MOTOR

1. Louis wondered why nobody would share a car with him later

2. If you see us at a set of lights, donít go looking for the next issue...

3. Cristian Brunelli will photograph for food. Or rob you. You decide

4. Get in the way of a racing driverís lunch and they will run you over