Model Volvo S60 T5 R-Design

Engine 1969cc 4cyl, dohc, 16v, turbo

Max power 192kW @ 5700rpm

Max torque 400Nm @ 2500-3500rpm

Transmission 8-speed automatic

Weight 1767kg

0-100km/h 6.3sec (claimed)

Fuel consumption 7.3L/100km

Price $64,990

On sale Now

YOU’RE NOT likely to buy a Volvo S60. No, really. The company aims to sell 400 cars in its first calendar year so a certain measure of exclusivity is more or less assured.

The market for sedans like this stands at around 40,000 per year, so the S60 needs to make a piffling 1 percent dent in it to create a warm and rosy glow in Gothenburg. Given that the XC40 and XC90 have achieved a 9 percent share and the XC60 a 16 percent slice of the pie, the S60’s targets look achievable.

The sedan arrives here with a choice of two powerplants. Around 96 percent of all the cars sold will be propelled by the turbocharged 2.0-litre T5 engine, with the remainder being the flagship turbocharged and supercharged T8 plugin hybrid. Volvo has pitched the S60 T5’s pricing way below that of the XC60, the SUV with which it shares much of its oily bits. The range kicks off at $54,990 for the T5 Momentum version, an allwheel- drive 187kW sedan which is at least $15K cheaper than an equivalent Audi A4 or BMW 3 Series.

Unfortunately, no Momentum or Inscription models were available to test, the launch vehicles comprising all 192kW/400Nm T5 R-Designs. Therein lies a problem. Put simply, the R-Design suspension is just too firm for Australian roads. The ride quality on both vehicles was notably terse, with a poorly controlled pitchiness. With no option of air suspension (something we always recommend to XC60 purchasers) and a low-profile tyre fitted, the S60 R-Design struggles.

The T5 claws back some credit with its wieldiness through corners. Good Continental tyres, clean, if somewhat mute, steering and a feeling that there’s not a lot of weight in the nose offer rewards to the keen driver. We’re used to this powerplant in the XC40 and XC60 and while we don’t expect a characterful, acoustically rewarding petrol engine in a mid-range family SUV, we do when choosing a quick sedan.

The S60 T5 R-Design is certainly brisk. It’ll trip the stopwatch at just 6.3sec on the sprint to 100km/h, the eight-speed Geartronic transmission rarely doing enough wrong for you to feel inclined to intervene with paddleshifting duties. For $65K in this range-topping trim, there are certainly more rewarding – and more supple – driver’s cars available.

It’s hard to pick fault with the S60’s interior finish though. CarPlay, Android there from the most affordable model. The cabin’s also a good deal more spacious in the rear than the old S60, which was notably tight on both head and legroom. The 390-litre boot is well down on the 480-litre class norm, but a split/fold rear bench and a ski hatch go some way to making amends.

There is a very good car in the S60. Unfortunately we didn’t get to drive it. The S60 T5 R-Design is well appointed, handsome, safe and competitively priced, but the tedious ride quality and dull engine acoustics will be enough to see it scratched from the shortlists of enthusiast drivers. We’ll reserve final judgment until we get behind the wheel, but an S60 T5 Momentum or Inscription on softer springs and with a more generous tyre sidewall could well prove a significantly smarter selection.



Good value; quality interior ambience; sleek styling; T5 engine offers decent shove


Irksome ride; small boot; insipid engine acoustics; R-Design not pick in range

Coming attractions

The new metal we’re driving next issue

1 AUDI 03

Stop Be if you’vehsard this onabefore, bUtthsalHtew Q3 compact SUV is about to be less compact. Its grown in virtually all dimensions, being longer [on a stretched wheelbase] and wider than Its predecessor. The cabin is appreciably more Spacious, and, naturally, updated connectivity and clever screens abound, Onr drive out of northern;, NSW should sesus inthe.35 tfsi model, which translates to1 TXOkW from a 1.5-litre turbo four.


Finally we get behind.the wheel of Porsche's landmark EV, so time to find out if the hype and our earlier impressions from the passengarseat matchthe reality. We'll drive both the turbo-free Turbo, and the equally turbo-tree Turbo S [what was the marketing department thinking?] and both promisepravlously unheralded spgrts performance and involvement from a battery-powered car


Do you know your T-Cross from your T-Rdc? What annoys yog more - confusing and meaningless model names,or rhetorical questions? We’ll attempt to address all this next month when we drive VW's sub-compact, Polo-based T-Cross SUV, which we expect will he offered in three spec levels, powered by two outputs of the l.D-Irtre turbo triple familiar from Polo. DP, and we'll also drive the T-Roc, Just to really confuse you.